The Divine Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
and Modern Eastern Orthodoxy:
Letters to a Greek Orthodox
By James Likoudis
PO Box 852, Montour Falls, NY 14865
($27.95 post-paid includes S&H)
|
With the Second Vatican Council came a renewed effort by the Catholic Church
to heal a centuries-old Schism with the bloc of Byzantine Greco-Slav churches
whose grievances can be said to date back to the sad events of 1054 and 1204
A.D. Discord between the See of Rome and the Patriarchate of Constantinople
combined with growing political and cultural estrangement exacerbated
theological disagreements over the Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, the
Procession of the Holy Spirit, the Filioque addition to the Latin text of the
Creed, the use of unleavened bread in the Western Church, and a host of other
liturgical differences that were regarded by the Byzantines as heretical
innovations.
The failure of the Reunion Councils of Lyons (1274) and
Florence (1439) did not, however, prevent other Reunion efforts
which succeeded in retaining the fidelity of millions of Eastern rite
Catholics in the Ukraine, Hungary, Rumania, and the Middle East. It is their
presence in the Church that has preserved the mark of "Catholic" for the true
Church of Jesus Christ.
The Byzantine Greco-Slav Schism has been the worst Schism in Christian
history, not withstanding the even worse consequences flowing from the
heretical Protestant Revolution which fractured the unity of Western
Christendom. It is not without significance that Martin Luther would appeal to
Eastern dissidents to justify his own bitter struggles against the Papacy.
With the Catholic Church now engaged in a "dialogue of love" with the
separated Christians of both East and West, Pope John Paul II has made
every effort to bring about the reconciliation of the Eastern Orthodox
churches with Rome. In countless addresses and frequent travels to meet
with their prelates and people, the Pope has affirmed that:
"..the spiritual riches of the Church in the East and in the West, cannot
shine before the eyes of contemporary man in their full splendor without this
witness of full reconciliation... In the Catholic view of ecumenism, the task
of achieving, with God's grace, the full visible unity of Christians must
always be a priority. Partial relationships between Christians which do not
yet express full communion in faith, the sacraments of faith, and order, are
never enough; not least because disunity continues to put obstacles in the way
of the mission entrusted by Christ to His disciples."
(cf. Address 6/24/91)
The Pope has repeatedly referred to the greatest of Russian philosophers and
thinkers concerned with European unity, Vladimir Soloviev
(1853-1900) as "an ardent prophet of ecumenism" who did "all in
his power for reunification between Eastern Orthodoxy and Catholicism."
Unfortunately, few American Catholics have had contact with their Eastern
Orthodox brethren in the U.S. or cared to have intimate knowledge of them in
order to facilitate prayer and ecumenical efforts to restore them to the
visible unity of the Church centered in the See of Peter. One notable
exception has been Likoudis, himself a convert from Greek Orthodoxy. In a
previous work "Ending the Byzantine-Greek Schism" (1982)
he gave an historical survey of the spread of the Schism and provided a
translation of the remarkable "Apologia for Unity with Rome" by the
14th c. Byzantine Greek lay theologian Demetrios Kydones who provided his
contemporaries with the works of St. Thomas Aquinas rendered in impeccable
Greek. Also provided readers were translations of the "Letter to the Greek
Patriarch of Constantinople on the Procession of the Holy Spirit" by St.
Peter Damian and a trenchant "Letter to a Greek Abbot in
Constantinople" by the Dominican friar John de Fontibus - both of which
give a fascinating insight into Latin-Greek relations from the 11th to 14th
centuries.
Mr. Likoudis also utilized effectively the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas to
defend Catholic doctrine on the perduring Primacy of Peter in the Church and
on the eternal Procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and (or through)
the Son.
In his latest work "The Divine Primacy of the Bishop of Rome and Modern
Eastern Orthodoxy: Letters to a Greek Orthodox", Mr. Likoudis returns to
explaining Catholic doctrines and defending them against the polemics of a
number of Eastern Orthodox writers (former Catholics and Protestant converts
to Byzantine Orthodoxy) who reject the "pan-heresy of ecumenism" and have
renewed medieval grievances against the Catholic Church and the Papacy. He
treats in great detail the defects in Eastern Orthodoxy's notion of the
Church, and replies to objections hurled against the Pope's Primacy of
Supremacy and Infallibility, the Procession of the Holy Spirit as explicated
in the Filioque clause, the definition of the Immaculate Conception of the
Theotokos, the doctrine of Purgatory, and even the denial of a legitimate
Development of Doctrine that must take place in a living Church.
His consideration of the "Christocentric nature of the Roman Primacy" and the
"Church as Icon of the Holy Trinity" give new insight into the theocratic and
theandric character of the visible Church established by the Lord on the
Rock-man Peter. An Appendix to this remarkable volume contains the valuable
1871 treatise of German Catholicism's great champion Bishop William Emmanuel
von Ketteler on "The Infallibility of the Teaching authority of the Pope
According to the Definition of the [First] Vatican Council".
"The Divine Primacy of the Bishop
of Rome and Modern Eastern Orthodoxy: Letters to a Greek Orthodox"
is a unique contribution to Catholic Apologetics. There is no similar work in
English which treats in detail Eastern Orthodox claims to be the continuation
of the Church of the Seven Ecumenical Councils.
***************
It is available directly from the author:
James Likoudis,
PO Box 852, Montour Falls, NY 14865
($27.95 post-paid includes S&H)
"Ending the Byzantine-Greek Schism" is also available from the same
address ($17.95 post-paid includes S&H).
Reprinted from "Pro Ecclesia" vol. XXXIII, no. 3 pgs. 23-24 (2002)
Mr. James Likoudis' Homepage
|